<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem with Twitter&#039;s Verified Accounts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bram.us/2009/06/12/the-problem-with-twitters-verified-accounts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bram.us/2009/06/12/the-problem-with-twitters-verified-accounts/</link>
	<description>A rather geeky/technical weblog by Bram(us) Van Damme</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:34:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fazer</title>
		<link>http://www.bram.us/2009/06/12/the-problem-with-twitters-verified-accounts/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>Fazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bram.us/?p=2122#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>Hi
I agree, but, I think is more important Twitter introduce an extra state which defines as “fan”, “impersonation/fake”, “bot”, that a &quot;bad&quot; one ... Thats my opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I agree, but, I think is more important Twitter introduce an extra state which defines as “fan”, “impersonation/fake”, “bot”, that a &#8220;bad&#8221; one &#8230; Thats my opinion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nujabes</title>
		<link>http://www.bram.us/2009/06/12/the-problem-with-twitters-verified-accounts/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Nujabes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bram.us/?p=2122#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>Good idea. It would kind of be like the &quot;dislike&quot; option for Facebook or voting something down when you don&#039;t like it on a social bookmarking site - giving your user base an option to police their own social network usually results in less work for you. Democracy ftw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea. It would kind of be like the &#8220;dislike&#8221; option for Facebook or voting something down when you don&#8217;t like it on a social bookmarking site &#8211; giving your user base an option to police their own social network usually results in less work for you. Democracy ftw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-06-13 &#124; burningCat</title>
		<link>http://www.bram.us/2009/06/12/the-problem-with-twitters-verified-accounts/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-06-13 &#124; burningCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bram.us/?p=2122#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>[...] [Full Post] The Problem with Twitter’s Verified Accounts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Full Post] The Problem with Twitter’s Verified Accounts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Clear Blue Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.bram.us/2009/06/12/the-problem-with-twitters-verified-accounts/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>A Clear Blue Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bram.us/?p=2122#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>Also interesting, what about defensively claimed accounts? I guess there are some people out there (like me) that have registered there name as account, but tweet from a different one (say with their regular nick name, like me). It is mine, but it doesn&#039;t do anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also interesting, what about defensively claimed accounts? I guess there are some people out there (like me) that have registered there name as account, but tweet from a different one (say with their regular nick name, like me). It is mine, but it doesn&#8217;t do anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

