<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [Elsewhere] Safari on&#160;PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bram.us/2007/06/11/safari-on-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bram.us/2007/06/11/safari-on-pc/</link>
	<description>A rather geeky/technical weblog by Bram Van Damme</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bramus!</title>
		<link>http://www.bram.us/2007/06/11/safari-on-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-54843</link>
		<dc:creator>Bramus!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bram.us/2007/06/11/safari-on-pc/#comment-54843</guid>
		<description>So I started commenting on threads on the subject on some of the big (webdevs) blogs out there to get some responses:

- 456bereastreet : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200706/safari_now_officially_available_for_windows/#comment66&quot;&gt;Roger thinks it&#039;s a font problem&lt;/a&gt;, but I doubt that as even Google or any other site have problems (which I then later on narrowed down to em elements not rendering, see comment above).

- snook.ca : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snook.ca/archives/browsers/why_safari_for_windows/#c49160&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt;Jake has the same problem&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snook.ca/archives/browsers/why_safari_for_windows/#c49171&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt;Dinoboff points out that it indeed might be the non-English XP&lt;/a&gt; (no source though :() and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snook.ca/archives/browsers/why_safari_for_windows/#c49172&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt;cpawl thinks it&#039;s my CSS&lt;/a&gt; ... yeah right :-P

- mezzoblue : &lt;a href=&quot;http://mezzoblue.com/archives/2007/06/12/a_subpixel_s/#c036879&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt;An anonymous commenter also points towards the non-English XP version as the guilty one&lt;/a&gt;.

- quirksmode : didn&#039;t comment on that thread, but in the comments &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/06/safari_30_windo.html#c7770&quot;&gt;Mathieu Kooiman also is pointing towards his Dutch XP&lt;/a&gt;

Hereby I think my guess towards the Dutch XP giving troubles was/is quite accurate and hope to see an updated Safari installer soon (not to say real soon).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I started commenting on threads on the subject on some of the big (webdevs) blogs out there to get some responses:</p>
<p>- 456bereastreet : <a href="http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200706/safari_now_officially_available_for_windows/#comment66">Roger thinks it&#8217;s a font problem</a>, but I doubt that as even Google or any other site have problems (which I then later on narrowed down to em elements not rendering, see comment above).</p>
<p>- snook.ca : <a href="http://www.snook.ca/archives/browsers/why_safari_for_windows/#c49160" title="">Jake has the same problem</a> and <a href="http://www.snook.ca/archives/browsers/why_safari_for_windows/#c49171" title="">Dinoboff points out that it indeed might be the non-English XP</a> (no source though <img src='http://www.bram.us/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> ) and <a href="http://www.snook.ca/archives/browsers/why_safari_for_windows/#c49172" title="">cpawl thinks it&#8217;s my CSS</a> &#8230; yeah right <img src='http://www.bram.us/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>- mezzoblue : <a href="http://mezzoblue.com/archives/2007/06/12/a_subpixel_s/#c036879" title="">An anonymous commenter also points towards the non-English XP version as the guilty one</a>.</p>
<p>- quirksmode : didn&#8217;t comment on that thread, but in the comments <a href="http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2007/06/safari_30_windo.html#c7770">Mathieu Kooiman also is pointing towards his Dutch XP</a></p>
<p>Hereby I think my guess towards the Dutch XP giving troubles was/is quite accurate and hope to see an updated Safari installer soon (not to say real soon).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bramus!</title>
		<link>http://www.bram.us/2007/06/11/safari-on-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-54713</link>
		<dc:creator>Bramus!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bram.us/2007/06/11/safari-on-pc/#comment-54713</guid>
		<description>Narrowed down the problem to the fact that em elements are not rendered visibly (you can select them though, yet without any visible text either)

Now, I&#039;ve heard none of the main webguru&#039;s out there complain about this, yet I&#039;ve heard colleagues complain about it so I&#039;m not the only one who&#039;s having the problem.

Wild guess: Maybe it&#039;s XP SP2 Dutch that&#039;s freaking out again? I remember that in the past this was the only XP version that was not able to install a beta product of Microsoft (all other languages had no troubles with it).

* seeks out to find a non Dutch XP on some box * ... hmmz, only Win2003 server boxes are present, not gonna install Safari on those; Don&#039;t want to stay up all night reviving some server :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrowed down the problem to the fact that em elements are not rendered visibly (you can select them though, yet without any visible text either)</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;ve heard none of the main webguru&#8217;s out there complain about this, yet I&#8217;ve heard colleagues complain about it so I&#8217;m not the only one who&#8217;s having the problem.</p>
<p>Wild guess: Maybe it&#8217;s XP SP2 Dutch that&#8217;s freaking out again? I remember that in the past this was the only XP version that was not able to install a beta product of Microsoft (all other languages had no troubles with it).</p>
<p>* seeks out to find a non Dutch XP on some box * &#8230; hmmz, only Win2003 server boxes are present, not gonna install Safari on those; Don&#8217;t want to stay up all night reviving some server <img src='http://www.bram.us/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.bram.us/2007/06/11/safari-on-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-54575</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bram.us/2007/06/11/safari-on-pc/#comment-54575</guid>
		<description>It would really surprise me if WebKit suddenly would display the same on Mac and PC. A friend and I had a look at the WebKit source a few months ago and getting it to build (not run) on Windows was only the first step. Then again, it probably has come a long way thanks to Adobe and their Apollo - excuse me: Air - runtime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would really surprise me if WebKit suddenly would display the same on Mac and PC. A friend and I had a look at the WebKit source a few months ago and getting it to build (not run) on Windows was only the first step. Then again, it probably has come a long way thanks to Adobe and their Apollo &#8211; excuse me: Air &#8211; runtime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
